top of page
Search

Travis Kelce Home Security

  • Writer: Patrick Hurley
    Patrick Hurley
  • Feb 4
  • 1 min read
ree

I agree that Kelce, high-profile, high-net-worth people, and everyone else should assess and enhance their home security requirements, but these enhancements seem antiquated. Did the RTTs (Retired This & That’s) get to him?

 

Dogs, unless also pets, are often more trouble than they are worth in a residential security program—even one as large as his. Moreover, dogs that are pets typically do not make reliable guard dogs. If they are genuine security dogs, there must be at least a reasonable profit margin for a security company, especially when employing two guards. This is an RTT thing.

 

Unless they’re only there for a few hours each day, the guards appear inexpensive, so he might be hiring some bottom feeders. This would lead to high turnover, frequent callouts, and all the issues associated with that group.

 

Ten cameras and motion detection capability for $40,000? It would be interesting to see what is included and how it is configured. Do they have edge analytics that could be leveraged as part of a more state-of-the-art security program?

 

Adequate security for large homes and estates isn’t complicated and doesn’t have to be expensive. A systematic assessment of threats and vulnerabilities, following proven fundamentals, combined with the latest technology and AI, provides the best, most effective, and most efficient solution.

 

If this report is accurate, he could have done better. Hopefully, he did, and this isn’t yet another example of what’s wrong with the security industry.

 
 
 

Comments


©2025 by S6RG, LLC

bottom of page